Identify overbroad definitions, missing carve-outs, and one-sided obligations in non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements.
Analyze Your Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDA) — FreeThe most important clause in any NDA. Check whether "confidential information" is specifically defined or so broad it covers everything discussed. A good NDA includes specific categories.
A mutual NDA protects both parties equally. A one-way NDA only protects the disclosing party. Make sure the agreement matches the actual nature of your relationship.
Most NDAs run 2–5 years. Perpetual NDAs (no end date) should be scrutinized carefully — especially for trade secret protections, which have their own legal duration rules.
The NDA should carve out disclosures required by law (e.g., court orders, regulatory requirements) and allow you to seek legal advice. The absence of these carve-outs is a red flag.
Upon termination, what happens to confidential documents, data, or materials? The NDA should specify whether they must be returned or destroyed and within what timeframe.
Well-drafted NDAs always carve out: (1) information already publicly known; (2) information you independently developed; (3) information you received from a third party without restriction.
An NDA with no expiration date means you could be bound forever. While trade secrets can warrant long protection, most business information becomes stale and public over time.
Defining confidential information as "anything communicated during our relationship" without specificity is unreasonably broad and practically unenforceable — but it creates legal risk and uncertainty.
An NDA that prevents you from disclosing information in response to a court order or regulatory subpoena can put you in an impossible position. Always require this exception.
If you're signing on behalf of a company but the NDA imposes personal liability on you individually, that personal exposure survives even if your business relationship ends.
An NDA should state why you're receiving confidential information and restrict its use to that purpose. Without this, there's ambiguity about whether you can use disclosed information for other business purposes.
This clause allows a party to seek an emergency court order (injunction) to stop a breach before it causes irreparable harm. Without it, your remedy may be limited to damages after the fact.
NDAs often skip dispute resolution. Should a breach dispute go to arbitration or court? Which jurisdiction's law applies? These details matter when enforceability is tested.
Upload your document and get an instant analysis: risks, red flags, missing clauses, and a plain English summary. No login required.
Upload & Analyze NowA one-way (unilateral) NDA protects only one party's confidential information — typically used when you're sharing information with a potential vendor or employee. A mutual NDA protects both parties equally and is appropriate when both sides are sharing sensitive information, such as in a joint venture or merger discussion.
Most NDAs for business purposes run 2–5 years. Employment-related NDAs may run longer for trade secrets, which have indefinite protection under law. Consumer-facing NDAs (e.g., with contractors) are commonly 1–3 years. Perpetual NDAs should be carefully considered.
Yes, but there may be consequences — an employer may withdraw a job offer, or a potential partner may not share information. You can also try to negotiate terms: request mutual obligations, reduce the duration, narrow the definition of confidential information, or add carve-outs.
Accidental breaches are common (e.g., mentioning a detail at a dinner party). The consequences depend on the harm caused and whether it was truly accidental. Courts look at intent and damages. Prompt disclosure and damage control are important. Some NDAs include a notice-and-cure period before formal breach.
An NDA restricts use of confidential information — it shouldn't restrict where you work. However, NDAs are often paired with non-compete clauses that do restrict employment. If your NDA is causing career restrictions, it may be overreaching or intertwined with an impermissible non-compete.